The Application of Maqasid in Contemporary Reality
Article Sidebar
Maqasid,
Ijtihad,
Contemporary,
Fatwa
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research addresses the application of Maqasid in contemporary reality, as a manifestation of the activation of the Maqasid of Sharia in dealing with modern events and incidents, by directing ijtihad, fatwas, and jurisprudential implementation in a way that achieves people’s interests and wards off harm. The concept of “the application of objectives” was established, its definition and position in the thought of the principles of jurisprudence were explained, along with mentioning its methodological controls. The research then reviewed the most prominent applications of Maqasid in the fields of fatwa, judiciary, Islamic politics, family, and finance, supporting this with practical examples and contemporary jurisprudential decisions issued by academic assemblies. The research concludes with the importance of expanding the application of objectives in contemporary ijtihad, with the necessity of regulating it with scientific controls, ensuring a balance between the text and its spirit, and the interest and its legal restrictions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Billeh, T., & Issa, H. A. (2022). The community penalties in the Jordanian criminal law: what are the alternatives to liberty-depriving penalties?. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 14(3).
Arifin, Z., & Haqqi, A. R. A. (2024). Islamic Law: Between Revelation and Human Thoughts. Afkar: Jurnal Akidah dan Pemikiran Islam, 26(1), 277-306. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol26no1.9
Awais, M., Öztürk, A. O., Bhatti, O. K., & Ellahi, N. (2024). Introduction: Foundations of Islamic Economics. In The Islamic Economic System (pp. 1-17). Routledge.
Bao, M., Zhou, A., Zottola, S., Brubach, B., Desmarais, S., Horowitz, A., ... & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2021). It's compaslicated: The messy relationship between rai datasets and algorithmic fairness benchmarks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05498. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.05498
Dimyati, K., Nashir, H., Elviandri, E., Absori, A., Wardiono, K., & Budiono, A. (2021). Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis. Heliyon, 7(8).
Elmahjub, E. (2021). Islamic jurisprudence as an ethical discourse: An enquiry into the nature of moral reasoning in Islamic legal theory. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(1), 16-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa023
Gal, U., Hansen, S., & Lee, A. S. (2022). Research perspectives: Toward theoretical rigor in ethical analysis: The case of algorithmic decision-making systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(6), 1634-1661. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00784
Gambari, Y. D., & Olawale, F. A. (2023). Qur'anic Model for Parenting in the 21st Century. Jurnal Adabiyah, 23(2), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.24252/jad.v23i2a9
Kausar, S., Leghari, A. R., & Soomro, A. S. (2024). Analysis of the Islamic Law and its compatibility with artificial intelligence as a emerging challenge of the modern world. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)10
Khairul Anam, R. (2024). Umer Chapra's Islamic Economic Philosophy and Relevance With Financial Technology. Available at SSRN 5151674. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5151674
Ni, Y. (2023). Enfeoffment to Use, Legalism, and Humanism in Gower's Mirour de l'Omme. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 122(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.5406/1945662X.122.1.04
Rohayana, A. D., & Muhtarom, A. (2021). Islamic Jurisprudence Implementation in Indonesia: Perspective of the Objectives of Islamic Law. Global Jurist, 21(2), 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2020-0078
Yasin, R., Rahman, N. H. A., Ghani, S. A., & Belal, M. (2024). GUARDIAN'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE WELFARE OF CHILDREN IN MARRIAGE: A STUDY ACCORDING TO ISLAMIC LAW. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(3), 778-789. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.765
Zulyadi, R., & Hossain, M. B. (2022). Alternative Criminal Punishments for the Settlement of Misdemeanor in a Social Justice Perspective. Law Reform, 18(1), 43-57.