Responsibilities of Committing Officers in the Implementation of Hospital Construction Auctions in South Sulawesi
Article Sidebar
Corruption,
Responsibility
Main Article Content
Abstract
Efforts to prevent corruption in the auction of goods and services are carried out by the government in various ways, one of which is by implementing an online system.PPK is an important instrument in the auction process for goods and services,In carrying out their duties, one of the accountable dimensions that a Commitment Making Officer (PPK) must possess is responsibility. Even with the use of an online system, if the organizer is not responsible, it can carry out various modes of cheating. Low responsibility Commitment Making Officer (PPK) is what often causes fraud in the auction of goods and services. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the responsibilities of the Commitment Making Officer (PPK) in the implementation of the auction for the construction of a hospital in South Sulawesi. Descriptive qualitative research method is used in this study, where the data collection techniques are carried out by in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation methods. Sources of data come from primary data and secondary data. The results showed that the PPK's responsibility in implementing the auction for the construction of a health hospital in South Sulawesi was still not optimal in terms of administrative/legal accountability. This is due to the low ability to carry out tasks as stated in the Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2021. In project planning, maintaining the confidentiality of information and project supervision.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Djojosoekarto, A. (2008). E-Procurement in Indonesia: Development of Electronic Procurement Services for Government Goods and Services. Jakarta: Partnership Partnership and National LPSE.
Gortner, H. F, K. L Nichols, & C. Ball. (2007). Organization Theory: A Public and Nonprofit Perspective, 3rd edition. Tompson Wadsworth. Belmont, CA
Haryati, D., Anditya, A. & Wibowo, R. A, (2011). Implementation of Electronic Procurement of Goods/Services (E-Procurement) at the Yogyakarta City Government", Journal of the Legal Pulpit, 23(2).
Jasin, (2007). Understanding To Serve: Implementing e-Announcement and e-Procurement in the Government Goods and Services Procurement System. Jakarta: Corruption Eradication Commission
Koppel, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of Accountability : ICANN and The Challenge of Multiple Accountabilities Disorder, Public Administration Review, 65(1).
Miles, B. Mathew & Huberman. M. (1992). Qualitative Data Analysis Source Book About New Methods. Jakarta: UIP.
Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability: An ever expanding Concept? Public Administration, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, 2000, 78: p. 555.
Mulgan, R. (2003). Holding Power to Accounts: Accountability in Modern Democracies. Basingstock: Palgrave.
OECD. (2007). Integrity on Public Procurement, Good Practices from A to Z”. Paris. Available at: Piga, G. “A Fighting Chance Against Corruption in Public Procurement?”
Rose Ackerman, S. & Soreide, T. (eds.) (2011). International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Volume Two, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Osborne, D. & T. Gaebler. (1993). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Plume Book. New York, NY.
Peters, B. G, (2010). The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration 6th edition. New York: Routledge.
Sutedi, A. (2012). Legal Aspects of Procurement of Goods & Services and Various Problems. Ed. 2. Jakarta, Sinar Graphic.
Wibowo, R. A. (2015). Preventing Corruption in the Procurement of Goods and Services (What has been and still needs to be done?) Volume 1 Number 1 – November 2015.https://jurnal.kpk.go.id